Category Archives: Appeal

Click-To-Call Technologies, LP v. Ingenio, Inc. et al.

Click-To-Call Technologies, LP v. Ingenio, Inc. et al. Docket No. 2015-1242 (IPR2013-00312) O’Malley, Taranto, Stark (with en banc footnote 3) August 16, 2018 Brief summary: Board’s decision that § 315(b) one-year time bar does not apply where earlier complaint was … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR | Leave a comment

Luminara Worldwide, LLC. vs. USPTO

Docket No. 2018-1629, -1631, -1633 IPR2015-01352, -10656, -01657, -01658 LOURIE, DYK, TARANTO August 16, 2018 Brief summary: Board finding that § 315(b) time-bar (IPR must be filed within one year of complaint servce) vacated as the bar applies to complaint … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Obviousness | Leave a comment

In re: Power Integrations, Inc.

Docket No. 2018-144, -145, -146, -147 IPR2017-01903, -01904, -01944, -01975 O’MALLEY, BRYSON, CHEN August 16, 2018 Brief summary: PI’s petitions petitions for a writ of mandamus challenging the PTAB’s decisions denying institution of IPRs of three patents denied (“this court … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR | Leave a comment

BioDelivery Sciences Int., Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. et al. (USPTO as Intervenor)

Docket No. 2017-1265-68 (IPR2015-00165, -00168, -00169) NEWMAN, LOURIE, REYNA July 31, 2018 Brief summary: BioDelivery’s requests for remand under SAS because the PTAB instituted IPRs on less than all asserted grounds granted and the PTAB’s FWDs were vacated. Summary: BioDelivery … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR | Leave a comment

PGS Geophysical AS v. USPTO

Docket No. 2016-2470, -2472, -2474 (IPR2015-00309, -00310, -0311) WALLACH, TARANTO, STOLL June 7, 2018 Brief summary: PTAB decision of obviousness affirmed. PTAB decision to only review certain claims and grounds included in IPR Petition not to be error in view … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Obviousness, Obviousness-Teaching Away | Leave a comment

In re: Timothy D. Durance, et al.

Docket No. 2017-1486 LOURIE, REYNA, CHEN June 1, 2018 Brief summary: PTAB affirmance of examiner’s obviousness rejection vacated and remanded due to the examiner’s and PTAB’s “multiple shifting articulations” of the rejections. Summary: Mr. Durance et al. appealed PTAB decision … Continue reading

Posted in Analgous Art, Appeal, Obviousness | Leave a comment

Knowles Electronics LLC v. Andrei Iancu (USPTO)

Docket No. 2016-1954 NEWMAN (D), CLEVENGER, WALLACH April 6, 2018 Brief summary: PTAB claim construction and affirmance of examiner’s obviousness rejections following reexamination requested by Analog Devices affirmed. FN2 explains that the PTO had the right to intervene after Analog … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Claim Construction, Obviousness, Reexamination | Leave a comment