Category Archives: Covered Business Method Reviews

Secure Axcess, LLC v. PNC Bank Natl. Assn. et al.

Docket No. 2016-1353 (CMB2014-00100, CBM2015-00009, CBM2015-00027) LOURIE (D), PLAGER, TARANTO February 21, 2017 Update: Petition for rehearing en banc denied (June 6, 2017) Brief Summary: Board characterization of ‘191 patent as a CBM patent reversed and vacated because the statutory … Continue reading

Posted in Covered Business Method Reviews | Leave a comment

Apple, Inc. et al. v. Ameranth, Inc. (CBM2014-00013) / Ameranth, Inc. v. Agilysis, Inc. et al. (CBM2014-00015, -00016)

Docket Nos. 2015-1703, -1704 REYNA, CHEN, STOLL November 29, 2016 Brief Summary: PTAB decision to institute CBM affirmed (no “technological invention” exception); conclusions of no patentability under §101 affirmed; conclusions of patentability under § 101 reversed (claims to “insignificant post-solution … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Covered Business Method Reviews, Patentability | Leave a comment

Versata Development Group, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2014-1194 NEWMAN, PLAGER, HUGHES July 9, 2015 Brief Summary: FC determined it “has the authority to review whether the ‘350 patent is within the PTAB’s § 18 authority” if the issue is “part of or a predicate to … Continue reading

Posted in Covered Business Method Reviews, Patentability | Leave a comment

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. JP Morgan Chase et al.

Docket No. 2014-1724 O’MALLEY, BRYSON, HUGHES (D) April 1, 2015 Brief Summary: FC determined it did not have jurisdiction over a motion to stay litigation regarding patents that are the subject of “pending CBMR petitions on which the PTAB has … Continue reading

Posted in America Invents Act, Covered Business Method Reviews | Leave a comment