Category Archives: Infringement

Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC et al. v. Apple, Inc.

Docket No. 2016-2324 PROST, CHEN, HUGHES November 22, 2017 Non-precedential Brief summary: DC claim construction and finding of no infringement by Apple affirmed. Summary: Rembrandt appealed DC grant of SJ of noninfringement by Apple’s “mobile products” (iPhone, iPad, and iTouch) … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Doctrine of equivalents, Infringement | Leave a comment

Eli Lilly et al. v. Perrigo / Amneal

Docket No. 2016-2555, -2614 CHEN, PLAGER, HUGHES November 22, 2017 Non-precedential Brief summary: DC decision that certain claims are not obvious (e.g., the prior art does not teach away); that certain other claims are obvious (e.g., alternatives theories presented here … Continue reading

Posted in Infringement, Obviousness | Leave a comment

Amgen Inc. et al. v. Apotex Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2017-1010 LOURIE, O’MALLEY, TARANTO November 13, 2017 Non-precedential Brief summary: DC decision of no infringement of Amgen’s process patent by Apotex’s ABLA applications regarding Amgen’s Neulasta® and Neupogen® affirmed. Summary: Amgen appealed DC conclusion that Amgen failed to … Continue reading

Posted in Biosimilars, Generics / ANDA, Infringement | Leave a comment

InterDigital Communications, Inc. et al. v. ZTE Corporation, et al.

Docket No. 2016-2362 PROST, LOURIE, TARANTO November 3, 2017 Non-precedential Brief summary: DC denial of ZTE’s post-trial motion for JMOL of noninfringement affirmed based on disputed claim construction affirmed (e.g., “[t]he specification expressly indicates that the invention is not limited … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Infringement | Leave a comment

Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ITC / Arista Networks, Inc. v. ITC

Docket Nos. 2016-2563, -2539 REYNA, SCHALL, WALLACH September 27, 2017 Brief summary: ITC decision that Arista’s importation of switches lacking software infringed (induced and contributory) Cisco’s patents affirmed. Summary: This decision relates to the ITC’s § 337 investigation based on … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Contributory Infringement, Inducement to Infringe, Infringement, International Trade Commission, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment

G. David Jang, M.D. v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al.

Docket No. 2016-1275, -1575 PROST, O’MALLEY, CHEN September 29, 2017 Brief summary: DC decision affirmed because Dr. Jang “was unable to meet his burden of” submitting “a proper hypothetical claim for consideration” proving that his [DOE] theory did not ensnare … Continue reading

Posted in Doctrine of equivalents, Infringement | Leave a comment

Intellectual Ventures I LLC, et al. v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al.

Docket No. 2016-1795 NEWMAN (C/D), DYK, TARANTO September 13, 2017 Brief summary: DC denial of JMOL to Motorola affirmed with respect to invalidity but reversed as to direct infringement under 35 USC § 271(a) (e.g., “the end user must be … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Claim Differentiation, Infringement, Obviousness | Leave a comment