Category Archives: Injunction

Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. et al. v. The Toro Co. and Exmark Manuf. Co.

Docket No. 2016-2433, -2514 MOORE, HUGHES, STOLL February 16, 2017 Brief Summary: The DC’s grant of a preliminary injunction against Toro was affirmed. Summary: Toro/Exmark (a wholly owned subsidiary of Toro) appealed DJ grant of a preliminary injunction (PI) to … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Infringement, Injunction, Obviousness | Leave a comment

United Construction Products, Inc. D/B/A Bison Innovative Products v. Tile Tech, Inc.

Docket No. 2016-1392 MOORE, WALLACH, STOLL December 15, 2016 Brief Summary: DC grant of default judgment and a permanent injunction to United for patent infringement and unfair competition claims affirmed. Summary: Tile Tech appealed DC grant of default judgment and … Continue reading

Posted in Injunction | Leave a comment

Murata Machinery USA, et al. v. Daifuku Co. Ltd. et al.

Docket No. 2015-2094 REYNA, CHEN, STOLL August 1, 2016 Brief Summary: DC decision denying Murata’s motion to lift a stay while IPR was in progress affirmed. DC denial of Murata’s motion for a preliminary injunction vacated and remanded because of … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Injunction, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Procedural Issues | Leave a comment

Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

Docket No. 2014-1802 PROST (D), MOORE, REYNA (C) September 17, 2015 Brief Summary: DC decision denying of Apple’s request for a permanent injunction against Samsung vacated and remanded because it erred in deciding the first two eBay factors (irreparable injury … Continue reading

Posted in Injunction | Leave a comment

Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs. and Apotex, Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2014-1416 LOURIE, DYK, REYNA August 22, 2014 Brief Summary: DC decision that Ferring’s claims were not obvious affirmed because “critical dissolution limitations” not taught or suggested by prior art. And infringement by “final, coated commercial…tablets” was not shown. … Continue reading

Posted in Functional limitations, Generics / ANDA, Infringement, Injunction, Obviousness | Leave a comment

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.

Docket No. 2013-1357 CHEN, CLEVENGER, HUGHES July 17, 2014 Brief Summary: Appeal of DC decision on injunction dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (DC did not modify injunction but “simply interpreted or clarified” it. Summary: Arlington and Bridgeport entered into a … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Injunction | Leave a comment

Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLC and Steven R. Aposhian

Docket No. 2013-1437 RADER April 9, 2014 Brief Summary: Decision denying preliminary injunction related to sod harverster patent vacated because DC abused its discretion. The opinion also explained “the fact that Trebro does not presently practice the patent does not … Continue reading

Posted in Infringement, Injunction | Leave a comment