Category Archives: Injunction

Amgen Inc. et al. v. Sanofi, Regeneron et al.

Docket No. 2017-1480 PROST, TARANTO, HUGHES October 5, 2017 Brief summary: DC’s exclusion of post-priority-date evidence relating to whether a representative number of species were described in the patents’ specifications reversed and remanded; grant of permanent injunction against Sanofi therefore … Continue reading

Posted in Injunction, Uncategorized, Written description | Leave a comment

Metalcraft of Mayville, Inc. et al. v. The Toro Co. and Exmark Manuf. Co.

Docket No. 2016-2433, -2514 MOORE, HUGHES, STOLL February 16, 2017 Brief Summary: The DC’s grant of a preliminary injunction against Toro was affirmed. Summary: Toro/Exmark (a wholly owned subsidiary of Toro) appealed DJ grant of a preliminary injunction (PI) to … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Infringement, Injunction, Obviousness | Leave a comment

United Construction Products, Inc. D/B/A Bison Innovative Products v. Tile Tech, Inc.

Docket No. 2016-1392 MOORE, WALLACH, STOLL December 15, 2016 Brief Summary: DC grant of default judgment and a permanent injunction to United for patent infringement and unfair competition claims affirmed. Summary: Tile Tech appealed DC grant of default judgment and … Continue reading

Posted in Injunction | Leave a comment

Murata Machinery USA, et al. v. Daifuku Co. Ltd. et al.

Docket No. 2015-2094 REYNA, CHEN, STOLL August 1, 2016 Brief Summary: DC decision denying Murata’s motion to lift a stay while IPR was in progress affirmed. DC denial of Murata’s motion for a preliminary injunction vacated and remanded because of … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Injunction, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Procedural Issues | Leave a comment

Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics, et al.

Docket No. 2014-1802 PROST (D), MOORE, REYNA (C) September 17, 2015 Brief Summary: DC decision denying of Apple’s request for a permanent injunction against Samsung vacated and remanded because it erred in deciding the first two eBay factors (irreparable injury … Continue reading

Posted in Injunction | Leave a comment

Ferring B.V. v. Watson Labs. and Apotex, Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2014-1416 LOURIE, DYK, REYNA August 22, 2014 Brief Summary: DC decision that Ferring’s claims were not obvious affirmed because “critical dissolution limitations” not taught or suggested by prior art. And infringement by “final, coated commercial…tablets” was not shown. … Continue reading

Posted in Functional limitations, Generics / ANDA, Infringement, Injunction, Obviousness | Leave a comment

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.

Docket No. 2013-1357 CHEN, CLEVENGER, HUGHES July 17, 2014 Brief Summary: Appeal of DC decision on injunction dismissed for lack of jurisdiction (DC did not modify injunction but “simply interpreted or clarified” it. Summary: Arlington and Bridgeport entered into a … Continue reading

Posted in Appeal, Injunction | Leave a comment