Category Archives: Licensing

DJ grant of SJ of non-infringement vacated due to pre-existing settlement agreement

Serta Simmons Bedding, LLC et al. v. Casper Sleep Inc. Docket No. 2019-1098, -1159 DYK, PLAGER, STOLL February 13, 2020 Brief Summary: DC grant of SJ vacated and remanded due to pre-existing settlement agreement. Summary: Serta appealed DC grant of … Continue reading

Posted in Article III disputes, Licensing | Leave a comment

DC dismissal affirmed as grandchild patent impliedly licensed in settlement agreement

Cheetah Omni LLC v. AT&T Services, Inc. et al. Docket No. 2019-1264 LOURIE, BRYSON, CHEN February 6, 2020 Brief Summary: DC dismissal of Cheetah’s claims against AT&T affirmed since grandchild patent was impliedly included in prior license to grandparent parent. … Continue reading

Posted in Licensing, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DC grant of SJ affirmed since covenant not to sue and exclusive license directed to different subject matter and not covered by merger clause

Molon Motor and Coil Corp. v. Nidec Motor Corp. Docket No. 2019-1071 LOURIE, REYNA, HUGHES January 10, 2020 Brief Summary: DC grant to SJ barring Molon since there was no merger of two agreements affirmed. Summary: Molon appealed DC grant … Continue reading

Posted in Licensing, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DC motion to dismiss remanded due to ambiguity regarding sublicense survival after bankruptcy

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft v. Sirius XM Radio Inc. Docket No. 2018-2400 DYK, LINN, TARANTO October 17, 2019 Brief Summary: DC grant of motion to dismiss reversed and remanded for reconsideration of evidence relating to survival of a sublicense after bankruptcy. Summary: Fraunhofer … Continue reading

Posted in Bankruptcy, Licensing, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. v. Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe

IPR Nos. 2016-01127 through -001132 U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,685,930B2; 8,629,111 B2; 8,642,556 B2; 8,633,162 B2; 8,648,048 B2; 9,248,191 B2 (“Allergan patents”) USPTO Decision Denying Tribe Motion to Terminate Brief summary: Board denied the Tribe’s motion to dismiss the IPR proceedings … Continue reading

Posted in Assignment / Ownership, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Licensing | Leave a comment

Prism Technologies LLC, et al. v. Sprint Spectrum et al.

Docket No. 2016-1456, -1457 TARANTO, LINN, CHEN March 6, 2017 Brief Summary: Jury finding of infringement and award of $30 million as a reasonable royalty upheld. Settlement agreement with AT&T was properly admitted as reasonable royalty evidence. Jury/DC properly relied … Continue reading

Posted in Licensing | Leave a comment

Bayer Cropscience AG et al. v. Dow Agrosciences LLC et al.

Docket No. 2016-1530, -1623 MOORE, TARANTO, CHEN March 1, 2017 Non-precedential Update:  SCOTUS denied review (12/4/17) Brief Summary: DC confirmation of international arbitration tribunal’s award to Bayer of $455 million for breach of contract (under French law) and patent infringement … Continue reading

Posted in Licensing | Leave a comment

Wi-LAN USA, Inc. et al. v. Ericsson, Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2015-1766, -1794 MOORE, O’MALLEY, WALLACH January 17, 2017 Non-precedential Brief Summary: DC grant of SJ for anticipation and non-infringement vacated; determination that Most Favored Licensee Provision of Agreement only applied to patents owned as of the date thereof. … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation (35 USC 102), Infringement, Licensing, Summary Judgment | Leave a comment

Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. Liown Electronics Co. et al.

Docket No. 2015-1671 MOORE, O’MALLEY, TARANTO February 29, 2016 Brief Summary: Luminara found to possess “substantially all rights” in Disney’s patent such that joinder was not required. Preliminary injunction was vacated due to error in DC’s claim construction. Summary: Liown … Continue reading

Posted in Assignment / Ownership, Claim Construction, Licensing | Leave a comment

Kimble et al. v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC

SCOTUS Docket No. 13-720 June 22, 2015 Brief Summary: Under Brulotte (US 1964), a patent licensing agreement cannot extend patent royalties beyond the patent expiration date. Summary: Marvel agreed to buy Kimble’s patent for a Spider Man toy in exchange … Continue reading

Posted in Licensing, Royalties | Leave a comment