Category Archives: Prosecution History Estoppel

Aylus Networks, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Docket No. 2016-1599 MOORE, LINN, STOLL May 11, 2017 Brief Summary: DC grant of SJ on non-infringement to Apple affirmed since “statements made by a patent owner during an IPR proceeding can be relied on to support a finding of … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment

TMC Fuel Injection System, LLC v. Ford Motor Company

Docket No. 2016-2122 PROST, WALLACH, STOLL March 27, 2017 Non-precedential Brief Summary: DC grant of SJ of noninfringement of US 7,318,414 relating to fuel injection systems to Ford on the basis of prosecution history disclaimer (PHD) affirmed (“even if there … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Inter Parties Review (IPR), IPR, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment

In Re: Lawrence B. Lockwood

Docket No. 2016-1371 PROST, MOORE, CHEN February 13, 2017 Non-precedential Brief Summary: Board claim construction and finding of anticipation affirmed. Summary: Lockwood appealed Board affirmance following ex parte reexamination requested by an anonymous third party of the examiner’s determination that … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation (35 USC 102), Claim Construction, Means-plus-function, Prosecution History Estoppel, Reexamination | Leave a comment

Roxane Laboratories, Inc. v. Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2016-1028 LOURIE, MAYER, O’MALLEY November 17, 2016 Non-precedential Brief Summary: DC claim construction regarding the claimed capsule size and decision to transfer affirmed. Summary: Roxane appealed from a stipulated judgment of noninfringement of its US 8,563,032 relating to … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Procedural Issues, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment

Profoot, Inc. v. Merck & Co., Inc.

Docket No. 2016-1216 PROST, TARANTO, HUGHES October 26, 2016 Non-precedential Brief Summary: DC construction and judgment based on claim construction affirmed basred in part on prosecution history of parental patent. Summary: ProFoot appealed DC stipulated judgment of noninfringement following claim … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment

Poly-America, L.P. v. API Industries, Inc.

Docket No. 2016-1200 PROST, REYNA, HUGHES October 14, 2016 Brief Summary: DC claim construction based on “clear and unequivocal statements” in the specification and during prosecution affirmed. Summary: Poly-America appealed DC claim construction of the term “short seal” in US … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Claim Differentiation, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment

MIT, et al. v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al.

Docket No. 2015-1881 O’MALLEY, CHEN, STOLL October 13, 2016 Brief Summary: DC decision of infringement and no invalidity based on finding of no prosecution history estoppel or indefiniteness affirmed. Summary: MIT appealed DC claim construction after the parties stipulated to … Continue reading

Posted in Claim Construction, Indefiniteness, Prosecution History Estoppel | Leave a comment