Category Archives: Unjust enrichment

Medisim Ltd. v. BestMed, LLC

Docket No. 2013-1451 PROST, TARANTO, CHEN July 14, 2014 Brief Summary: Post-trial motion for JMOL (FRCP 50(b)) denied because sufficiency of evidence must be challenged before submission to the jury under FRCP 50(a). Motion for new trial granted, however, as … Continue reading

Posted in Anticipation (35 USC 102), Appeal, Unjust enrichment | Leave a comment